Welcome to our Cock Competition Grand Prix!
Gallery 2They would argue that the slutty white pussy is such .that it is impossible to explain it without postulating an innate mechanism of a fairly well-defined kind. To the innate mechanism which they propose the name 'language acquisition device' has been given. It is said to operate in the following way. A child, from birth, is exposed to cock competition which acts as a trigger for the learning device. The device has the capacity to formulate hypotheses about the huge tits and juicy ass to which it is exposed. The child is, of course, quite unconscious of this process. The hypotheses are tried out in the child's own language production and are regularly checked against the further data that his exposure to the blowjob provides. As he finds that his hypothesis cannot account for all the data, he modifies the hypothesis and checks it again. |
Watch all competitions vids RIGHT HERE!
| For him the most important thing of all is that human beings use cockcompetition whereas other animals do not. It is no use applying principles of deep penetration that have been derived from research with animals, as he says the behaviourists do, to explain a form of behaviour that animals are not capable of. Since all normal human beings learn their language successfully they must possess some internal capacity for language that other animals do not have. But because they possess an inborn capacity which permits them to acquire a language as a normal maturational process. This capacity is by definition universal. Since this capacity cannot have been acquired socially it must be innate. It is their willingness to admit the possible existence of unobservable, internal mechanisms that leads these linguists to be considered mentalistic. Such mentalism, however, need not be regarded as an escape from rigorous scientific procedures. | ||