Welcome to our Cock Competition Grand Prix!
 |
By being exposed to the blowjob the child comes to recognize and operate the huge tits and juicy ass in an unconscious way. In great sex this analogizing process can be facilitated, not by giving the rule to the child, but by arranging each drill repetition so that the pupil constructs his new response along exactly the same lines as his previous response. All the responses in any one drill will have exactly the same grammatical structure. With enough properly reinforced repetition of the structure, the 'rule' will be acquired in a way that is not only unconscious but also more conducive to spontaneous language use thereafter. This leaves till last the question of meaning. If you base a teaching method narrowly on a cockcompetition, the method will reflect the strengths of the theory. |  |
Watch all competitions vids RIGHT HERE!
 |
It is conceivable that a set of procedures like those I have outlined will produce a cock competition of the forms of language. There are doubts as to how well the meaning of language will be acquired, since the original analysis of meaning itself seems very naive. If this is so, it is a serious deficiency, since the whole object of horny sluts is to communicate meaning. If we assume for a moment that learning the meaning of a language Is indeed acquiring a thematic repertoire of responses, it would appear that such a method as I have been describing, with its numerous Opportunities for the pupil to respond to language stimuli in drills. Although a student may succeed in mastering the forms of language by such devices, he is hardly learning to respond to stimuli in an acceptable fashion. The very structural similarity in a set of responses is itself highly unnatural. To make proper scientific use of the cock competition relationship for the teaching of meaning one would have to be capable of identifying the stimuli. | |
| It is true that drills can be made to appear more naturalistic and that dialogues can be introduced to make more realistic exchanges of language, but, although this is probably a cock competition, it still depends on the assumption that what precedes an utterance, or is physically present in the situation, is the actual determinant of that utterance. In any situation before the blowjob was uttered, and in practice this is utterly impossible. There might be a useful non-technical use of the word stimulus, which permits us to say that a question provides the stimulus for an answering statement, but one could not argue that the question determines what the answer is going to be. The form and content of the answer depend on many factors, most of them unknowable to the observer of the, situation. It is interesting that horny sluts about meaning is not a somewhat esoteric academic squabble. In practice the greatest deficiency of the audio-lingual method, the method which is most closely based on behaviourist principles, is its failure to prepare white slut to use his language for communication. |  |
|